Factuals & Factives Board

[Old Owner]

I think really without even realizing it, the points Flyboy Fox mentioned are all exactly things one would expect from any member anyways. It's not something that necesarily needs to be brought up for Factives/Factivekin specifically in my opinion. Just like a fictionkin shouldn't go harass and stalk their author to demand they change their story to make it "accurate" or something similar, a factive or factivekin would have similar expectations towards the living people they identify as.

This is actually what I was saying. It seems there was a misunderstanding. Since all this wasn't brought up with any of other boards, it seemed a little odd to me. I thought that the rules essentially implied that all members should be on their best behavior. Fictionkin can be just as triggering as factuals. This is especially true with canons in which characters did hurt eachother. Take "Frozen" for example, and look at Hans' relationship with me and with Anna Now, if a Hans joined, however, and he remained respectful, I would not ban him. The same goes for factives and factuals. If they behave themselves, then all should be well. It's simply when a small trigger becomes a huge threat that we have a problem.

 

[Black mirror]

There was a case of a fellow beliving themself to be james bond, convinced a girl that he was a spy and ended up abducting her, (claiming it was for her own pretection).


There is anouther more recent case of a teenage girl beliving she had a direct mental link to slenderman, ended up murdering a random kid in a park (to protect her family from slenderman)

There is some examples for you of fiction kin and fictives  being dangerous, and breaking laws.

Wich only varifies what snow monarch was saying reguarding any one can be dangerous.
I dont think i have to point out normal humans committing simuliar crimes do I? 



As for the term factives and factokin, ive heard them refered to as dopplekin in the past not sure if thats a valid term tho.


(Addition)
As for triggers, i have some unusual ones that are never considered by others, i dont realy expect them to automatticly know that they bug me and can ruin my mood for days.
It dosnt change that they bug me but i understand that they dont know that it bugs me.

My bigest triggers is disrespect to nonhuman animals, wich includes pointless violance twords nonhuman animals and display of delusions of superiority over non human animals.

In this world having to live surrounded by human society  these triggers are unavoidable, would be nice if i could avoid them but i cant. So why should any one else get away trigger free?

(Note: sorry Im just in a bad place i ment no disrespect to folks with triggers as i know how bad they are)

In a attempt to rephrase my statment about triggers in a not so emotional way,
I understand that folks dont know things will trigger people.
Any thing can be a trigger.
Why should some one have to watch what they say, just so they dont trigger some one?
If we tried to avoid all possible triggers, nothing would ever be said.
Following the rules of the forum should be enough, if you agree to them.
Adding extra conditions for yourself and expecting others to fallow them is rediculous.

 

[AlmostAmalthea]

^ A very good point. Anybody can be dangerous for any reason. But this is not a reason to fear everybody and hide under the bed. Most of the people are very nice, 'kin or not.  So, let there be the "everybody is innocent until proven guilty" ^-^

 

[Black mirror]

Exactly my point thank you amalthea